DFAIT logo partnership The logo for the by design elab, an independent research development and production think tank specializing in online forums for policy development, incubated in 1997 at the McLuhan Program at the University of Toronto
DFAIT Home Site Map Help Policies Partners Feedback Netcast Français
 
Welcome
Message from the Minister
Dialogue Paper
Answer Questions
View Answers
Discussion Forum
 

Conclusion: The World We Want

Thank you for participating in the Dialogue on Foreign Policy. The interactive web site is now closed. The Minister's report will appear on this web site once it is released.

This Forum is bilingual, and participants post messages in their language of choice.

trade

Contributor: James

Date: 2003-02-07 14:36:22


Canada continues to be highly protective in areas that could be of great benefit to poor people in Third World countries, such as dairy and poultry imports and textiles.
Canadian jobs and businesses might suffer if we relax trade restrictions in these areas and in some cases these are our poorest, most vulnerable citizens - for example, working in poultry processing plants and for textile manufacturers. These Canadians need attention as part of a Canadian policy to relax import barriers.

Far more could/should be done in the area of research and development, particularly agricultural research. Much of the Canadian research agenda is now being driven by the private sector, as in Agriculture Canada's Matching Initiatives Incentive program. These kinds of programs ought to be opened up to matching money/initiatives from the NGO and global aid sector, and the NGOs ought to be encouraged to set aside part of their budgets for R&D to address pressing issues for poor people in Third World countries.

More government resources should be made available to NGOs, especially the Christian organizations.

Reply to this message

trade

Contributor: cfallon

Date: 2003-02-07 15:42:26


I agree. Our best means of helping the 3rd world is by opening our markets, particularly, to agricultural products. We need to help them where we can in developing technologies that produce active and vital crops.

Reply to this message

trade

Contributor: fatmomma

Date: 2003-03-03 22:59:06


What poor country has food to export; their people are starving. They may need help learning to grow or raise food to feed themselves but not for export. Where did you come up with these ideas. Textiles could be a possibility. We do import many textiles. I am a drycleaner and very few textiles are manufactured in Canada or the USA; Too expensive so we import.

Reply to this message

trade

Contributor: cfallon

Date: 2003-03-04 15:03:16


Lots of poor contries have agriculture:

Zimbabwe used to be the breadbasket of Africa and could return to that position one day. And it's not the only country in Africa with fertile land.

South America is blessed with great expanses of fertile land.

Being poor does not mean starving. This is a mis-conception.

Either way, I agree, importing textiles from the 3rd world would help as well.

Reply to this message

trade

Contributor: fatmomma

Date: 2003-03-09 22:05:22


Zimbabwe "used to be"
What does poor mean to you. If they can feed themselves, cloth themselves.
only other possible necessity is medicine or better variety of food.We are always being asked to help feed these countries.
We import products we need. Why should we import poultry or dairy food. If they produce a product not available in Canada and it meets our standards. Some products, some countries can carry pests or disease that threaten native crops.

Reply to this message